The second evidence session for The Culture, Media and Sport Committee Inquiry into library closures will take place on Tuesday 21 February (Committee Room 15, Palace of Westminster).
The Committee will hear evidence from representatives of Arts Council England, Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP), Isle of Wight Council, Leicestershire Library Services and the Local Government Association.
Further details of the session can be found here.
The session will be screened on the internet via Parliament.tv
The first session saw Abby Barker (Voices for The Library), Sue Charteris (author of the report on Wirral library closures), Andrew Coburn (The Library Campaign) and Miranda McKearney (The Reading Agency) give evidence.
Below are some of the comments and points raised during that session (paraphrased).
- Miranda McKearney: The passionate work of campaigners over the past 18 months has started to shift the debate about what libraries mean to us all.
- Abby Barker: A lot of people making these cuts don’t understand what a library is, or what it does, or what librarians can offer.
- Andrew Coburn: In local areas libraries offer a social place to build communities, based around services they provide.
- Abby Barker: Local libraries are important. Not all people can get to the central library branch. There is room for both large ‘destination’ libraries and small libraries to provide services. They complement each other.
- Abby Barker: The cuts are focused on books & buildings. Librarians aren’t just there to stamp books. Librarians are there to enhance your experience of the library.
- Andrew Coburn: A lot of what library staff do is about direction, mediation & assistance. The fewer library staff there are in the system the more difficult it is to get an answer from anywhere in that system.
- Miranda McKearney: Even though ‘you clearly have access to the things you need to live your life. Lots of people don’t’. (Response to MP about why libraries are needed)
- Abby Barker: If comprehensive & efficient could be more clearly defined, local authorities may be able to make better decisions.
- Abby Barker: Library consultations are being run from the top down and local authorities are not listening to or taking into account users needs.
- Andrew Coburn: What’s the point of the Secretary of State having powers of intervention if they aren’t used? He needs to “grasp the nettle.”
- Andrew Coburn: How will volunteer run libraries affect the statutory duties?
- Abby Barker: Volunteers can add value to a library service, but they shouldn’t be seen as a replacement service.
- Miranda McKearney: Partnership working on a national level with librarians is difficult because there aren’t enough of them.
- Miranda McKearney: There are some things you can only do nationally to improve library services – we need a national strategy!
- Sue Charteris: Local authorities need to look at equalities assessment of local needs.
- Sue Charteris: Isn’t keen on having more regulations, but feels local authorities need guidance from Secretary of State & Arts Council England.
- Sue Charteris: Library services need proper communications teams to sell their benefits.
- Sue Charteris: There has to be a prominent role for librarians in providing public library services. They are key.
- Sue Charteris: Volunteers are well-placed to do certain things in libraries, but a sound policy on volunteering by local authorities is key.
- Sue Charteris: The Secretary of State role needs to be more pro-active nationally.
- Sue Charteris: Current public library legislation needs to be looked at, because it is “cumbersome” and out-of-date.
- Sue Charteris: Believes that some kind of peer review would be useful to ensure library services are heading in the right direction.