Abolition of the Advisory Council on Libraries to go ahead

In 2010 the Government announced the intention to abolish the Advisory Council on Libraries (ACL). The ACL was established as part of the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964, its duty being “to advise the Secretary of State upon such matters connected with the provision or use of library facilities whether under this Act or otherwise as it thinks fit and upon any questions referred to it by him”. However, almost 4 years later (early 2014) DCMS held a public consultation on this proposal and the Government response to the consultation was published last week.

The summary response from the Government appears below:

the Government notes that almost all respondents, i.e. six out of the seven that answered the individual questions, do not think the advisory function of ACL should be transferred to another existing body and that a slight majority i.e. four out of the seven respondents consider the ACL should be retained and improved.  While noting these comments the Government preferred option remains to abolish the ACL. The Government considers that the function of advising the Secretary of State does not require a statutory body and in the absence of the ACL, DCMS works closely and meets on a regular basis with relevant stakeholders to discuss library sector issues

We are extremely disappointed by this decision to abolish ACL, especially in light of the responses highlighting the role an improved and re-invigorated ACL could have performed in relation to England’s public libraries. We believe that the development of the ACL role could have provided independent strategic leadership and guidance for the development, support and sustainability of public libraries in England, as well as a means to enforce statutory duties and ensure comprehensive and efficient service requirements were met.

The full government response can be found here: ACL_Govt_Response__final_version_.

Voices for the Library response to the consultation can be found here: VFTL response Abolition of Advisory Council on Libraries

 

One thought on “Abolition of the Advisory Council on Libraries to go ahead

  1. Christopher Pipe

    Of course it’s true that “the function of advising the Secretary of State does not require a statutory body”, but a statutory body with a remit of advising the SofS on libraries (whether or not the SofS wanted their advice) would surely be better than relying on civil servants to consult the sector and advise the SofS when asked? Or am I being naive?

    This government is getting good at ignoring advice, of course. Ed Vaizey moved the administration of public lending right to the BL claiming it would save money but refused to explain the basis of his calculations. But still I’d like to see ministers being openly and expertly advised.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *